Lawyer Central- National Network of Attorneys for Lawsuits and Claims

Insight from attorney Scott Weinstein of Morgan & Morgan, PA was featured in a recent article on Bloomberg.com entitled "China Drywall Emits Gas; No Tie to Illness, U.S. Says (Update 3)." The article, written by Mark Drajem, summarizes the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission's recent findings on Chinese drywall, which has been linked to sulfur odors and damage to wires and air conditioning units. The CPSC investigators found elevated sulfur emissions in the Chinese drywall they tested, but did not find sufficient evidence that it causes the headaches, asthma, and nosebleeds that many homeowners have experienced.

In response to the large number of defective Chinese drywall claims being filed throughout the country, the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation issued an order centralizing In re: Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation, MDL 2047, in June. The MDL consolidated Chinese drywall lawsuits in the Eastern District of Louisiana before Judge Eldon E. Fallon. Scott Weinstein, who has been named to the Plaintiff's Steering Committee for the Chinese drywall MDL, explains in the article that plummeting housing prices have left many homeowners unable to sell homes that have been contaminated by Chinese drywall.

Compounding the complicated issues surrounding Chinese drywall is that fact that it may prove difficult for U.S. courts to hold Chinese manufacturers accountable for this defective product. In the article, Weinstein states that Knauf Gips KG and Beijing New Building Materials Plc are two of the major Chinese drywall suppliers. During a recent visit to China, CPSC Chairman Inez Tenenbaum asked Chinese suppliers to pay for the damage caused to homes built with the defective drywall. However, whether these suppliers will cooperate with U.S. requests remains to be seen.

To read "China Drywall Emits Gas; No Tie to Illness, U.S. Says (Update 3)" on Bloomberg.com, please visit: http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=afNV0nTV7y_k.

If you are interested in learning more about Chinese drywall, visit Morgan & Morgan's Defective Chinese Drywall Resource Center. Informational articles about the signs and causes of defective Chinese drywall, potential health risks, property damage issues, and more are available on this webpage for consumers to review. If you believe your home may have been built with Chinese drywall, complete the Free Case Evaluation form to have your potential claim reviewed by a Chinese drywall attorney.

About Morgan & Morgan

Morgan & Morgan is one of the largest Personal Injury law firms in the country with offices nationwide. The firm handles product liability cases, personal injury cases, and medical malpractice cases, as well as claims against drug and medical device manufacturers. Visit ForThePeople.com for a free case evaluation and information about your legal rights.

The ClassAction.org consumer fraud team is currently investigating claims that many of the nation's largest banks have instituted unfair and deceptive overdraft protection policies. These policies affect consumers who make debit card purchases or write checks with insufficient funds in their accounts. By charging costly overdraft fees on each transaction made with insufficient funds and reordering customers' transactions in order to maximize the number of overdraft fees that can be incurred, banks are using these policies as a way to generate profits while victimizing their customers.

With overdraft protection plans, banks will not refuse a check or debit card transaction for insufficient funds. Instead, they intentionally allow consumers to continue using their debit cards even when they have a negative balance. They are then able to charge an overdraft fee (usually around $35.00) on each transaction. If a customer makes several transactions in one day, these charges can add up quickly and create an overwhelming financial burden. In addition, the overdraft fee is sometimes far greater than the cost of the transaction, such as when a $35.00 overdraft fee is incurred for a $5.00 purchase.

Many of the country's largest banks have had complaints filed against them alleging that these overdraft protection practices are unfair and deceptive. In addition, the complaints allege that some banks reorder the transactions in a customer's account so that they can maximize the amount of overdraft protection fees owed. For example, if a series of debits comes into the bank on a given day, the bank will process the largest debit first no matter when it occurred that day. Although some banks have decided to alter their overdraft protection policies in response to the suits filed against them, others are continuing to carry out these practices.

If you believe that you have been the victim of unfair overdraft practices, visit the ClassAction.org Unfair Overdraft Protection Fees page now. A No Cost, No Obligation Case Evaluation form is available on this page for consumers who are interested in learning more about their legal rights. Please complete the form with the details of your experience. ClassAction.org is dedicated to helping consumer fraud victims obtain the justice and compensation they deserve.

About ClassAction.org

ClassAction.org is dedicated to protecting consumers and investors in class actions and complex litigation throughout the United States. ClassAction.org keeps consumers informed about product alerts, recalls, and emerging litigation and helps them take action against the manufacturers of defective products, drugs, and medical devices. Information about consumer fraud issues and environmental hazards is also available on the site. Visit ClassAction.org today for a no cost, no obligation case evaluation and information about your consumer rights.